9 Reasons Why PolitiFact Is Unqualified to Label ‘Fake News’

Left-leaning PolitiFact is on the newly revealed list of “fact checking” organizations Facebook will reportedly use to label “fake news” stories as they appear on the social media platform.

“We’ll use the reports from our community, along with other signals, to send stories to these organizations,” Facebook VP Adam Mosseri wrote in the Facebook news blog. “If the fact checking organizations identify a story as fake, it will get flagged as disputed and there will be a link to the corresponding article explaining why.”

Facebook’s decision to tout PolitiFact as a credible and independent fact checker is awfully disturbing, given the organization’s repeated smear campaign against Donald Trump throughout the 2016 election.

Facebook’s “fake news” flaggers, Politifact, et al., have a history of showing sympathy for left-wing narratives. Time and again PolitiFact published stories that favored Hillary Clinton’s candidacy, while promoting “fact checks” meant to rebut or embarrass Republicans.

Below is a list of the many instances proving why Politifact is completely unqualified to be an objective judge of what’s real and “fake” news.

1. Last March, PolitiFact delivered a “mostly false” rating for a joke made by Republican Senator Ted Cruz.

 

Read More

 


source: http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/12/15/9-reasons-politifact-unqualified-label-fake-news/

You Might Like
Share

7 Comments

      1. randy

        I’m a con..room subscriber but didn’t know who wrote the article until I went to the site. I don’t subscribe to far right white nationalist rag crap like breitbart

        1. Osamao

          So your a lying Lib pretending to be a Real American? I can smell you from here. There’s a bunch of you doing it. Not a good Idea. Just as obvious as when you were using stolen valor for your posts.

  1. RRStubbs

    This is an affront to everyone’s rights under the First Amendment Free Speech clause. Anybody up for a class action lawsuit?

  2. ernst

    Having Mark Zuckerberg as the arbiter of on-line news is scary. Might as well give the job to Hillary Clinton.