Hillary Now Pulling ‘Old-Fashioned Sexism’ Card

2016’s Democratic Presidential loser Hillary Clinton, during a discussion at Georgetown University stated her defeat to President Trump was caused by misogyny and “old-fashioned sexism and a refusal to accept the equality of women.”

When later questioned about hate towards women’s rights. Clinton stated, “I see it as a reaction that is driven by lots of different motives, some of them having to do with people feeling insecure, frightened, disappointed, discouraged—name whatever emotion you want—about their lives and the ongoing globalization of the economy, which is leaving many people out. And we haven’t seen anything yet. Wait until robotics and AI, artificial intelligence really takes off. So when people are insecure and anxious, they often defend against their own feeling by rejecting others. That often happens with minorities. It happens with ethnicities, races, religion and it also happens with respect to women.”

“Any of you who have read my book about what happened know that I think misogyny and sexism was part of that campaign. It was one of the contributing factors, and some of it was old-fashioned sexism and a refusal to accept the equality of women, and certainly the equality of women’s leadership, and some of it was an outgrowth of all this anxiety and insecurity that is playing on people and leading them in a hunt for scapegoats.”

“We’ve got to leave that here at home, and that comes through the ballot box in an election year 2018 in the United States. There’s a lot that can be done to say wait a minute. We are not going backward when it comes to race and religion and sex and gay rights and all the rest of it. We are going to keep moving forward because we want an inclusive, tolerant society and that includes everybody. Not just some of us, but all of us.”

  • grinnie

    Hill……boo hoo…..you LOST.

    • Gary Smith

      GOOD!

  • John Elliott

    Or maybe you lost because you are dishonest and people just don’t trust you or in fact don’t like you. Is your insecurity and that of the rest of the left the reason for your very open hatred of the president and commander in chief of this great country Donald Trump??

    • Gary Smith

      Well said

    • Suzu M

      You summed it up more quickly than I did. But you bring up another point. Her ‘ability’ to be friendly with every single person, until that person becomes her competition. She often goes from listing her ‘friend’s’ wonderful attributes, to declaring her competitor’s fault’s and closet skeletons. Do we trust a woman like that? Do we trust ANYONE like that? No.

      • JB

        Another excellent post…. Sadly, these hardcore feminists and libs will continue to vote for her should she run, for no other reason than she’s a woman and a uber liberal.
        That entire demographic is so out of touch with the electorate today.

        The fact that Trump won all of those five safe blue States should be enough for them to realize the the country is fed up with pandering to every extreme special interest group in this country.

        • RightWriter

          Hillary won’t be running again. Assuming she even LIVES until the 2020 cycle, she’ll be almost 75. While it’s possible for a president to get RE-elected at that age, it’s probably too old to put someone in the WH for the first time. Plus, she KNOWS she’d get beaten AGAIN, and she really COULDN’T endure THAT.
          Problem is, the younger Hillary-like feminazis, including Elizabeth Warren, Kirsten Gillibrand, Kamala Harris…they’re ALL angling for a crack at it. (Don’t bet on Chelsea Clinton. I think she’s HAD it with politics!)

    • JB

      Couldn’t have said it any better myself ….. she is so self-absorbed that she still,15 months later can’t believe she lost! And what makes it better for us she lost to Donald Trump whom she abhors….
      Just go home like every other losing presidential candidate and forget it.

      As much as I dislike that fraud John Edwards he just went away and faded into the woodwork which she should take a page out of his book and do the same.

      • RightWriter

        The difference was, almost nobody really expected John Edwards to win and he had ZERO personal support. Hillary DID (still does) have a LOT of backers among the extreme feminist — the people Rush Limbaugh calls the “feminazi” crowd — who would have voted for her NO MATTER WHAT, just to have the “FIRST WOMAN PRESIDENT.” They’re faithful unto death to Hillary, no matter WHO she is or WHAT she says, just because she IS a female and they wanted a female to win. Problem (for Hillary) was, there turned out NOT TO BE ENOUGH OF ‘EM and they were in ALL THE WRONG STATES to win in the Electoral College.

  • samnigromd

    She wants equality with men, but whimpers and whines like a weak woman when she loses if she gets treated “like a man…”FEMINISTS DESTROY EVERYTHING–
    LADY MACBETH IN CHARGE
    OR MAYBE CLYTEMNESTRA
    FEMINISTS WANT ALL THE JOBS, MEN NOT USING THEIR FULL ABILITIES, ALL THE BOYS IN THE CORNER LETTING THE GIRLS WIN AND LEARN, AND ALL THE MEN IN PRISON…AND AMERICAN WOMEN TURNED INTO A HAREM…”Act/dress like a harem whore to entrap, demasculate or manipulate males–they are fools for our boobs and butts; and learn to give a hand-job and they will be moaning dullards forever and you can claim sex assault later” is our conquering motto–THANK YOU CONTRACEPTION AND ABORTION SO WE DO NOT HAVE TO BE LOYAL TO NATURE.
    By Samuel A. Nigro, MD July 2014/2017, retired
    over 50 years of psychiatric practice,
    Assistant Clinical Professor Psychiatry Case Western Reserve School of Medicine
    copyright c Samuel A. Nigro, MD 2017
    deplorable ad hominem pamphleteer

    “Unnatural deeds do breed unnatural troubles: infected minds to their deaf pillows will discharge their secrets. More need they the divine than the physician.”

    Hillary Clinton finally told why she lost the election to President Trump: because she was a woman. “You know you’re going to be subject to unfair and beside-the-point criticism,” she said in response to a question on the difficulties of women running for office. As one of the most emancipated “equal” women who ever existed (except for maybe the brutal first Queen Elizabeth), Hillary proved she does not deserve the presidency or major anything. And maybe no woman does. Her words make men scream: “ISN’T THAT JUST LIKE A WOMAN!” — words said for centuries by men bewildered by the idiotic intrinsic double standards of women carrying on as if they were really equal to men and then whimper “I am a woman” to protest being actually treated like a man. Women never heard of the Equal Misery Amendment–act like a man, get treated like one. Being “a man,” she was treated like one and refuses to believe it–she wanted the door held open for her. They play “the female card” to get sexist advantages as they pretend equality.
    Abstract: Feminism is really a big victimism entitlement con stupefying males into deferring to women as a pretense of “equality” by becoming: a “do not assert your full male virtue and abilities in job hunting or anything else fool, a deadbeat unnecessary dad, an incompetent family man, a gay cult genital maniac, a drug-using uneducated unemployable parasite, and a criminal. That also was the celebrated “women’s march” in January 2017. It really was a LOSERS’ MARCH–women who are not able to “lose like a man”, wearing what they called their “pussyhats”–and having what lesbians call a “cuntfest” and some chanting “cunt” as the audience is led to do in the play Vagina Monologues–all really created by the genital maniacs of the gay cult. It was all over the world in January 2017, which actually had women (a word they no longer deserve), upset over a woman losing an election, hating, assaulting, demeaning and doing what they claimed to be protesting. Isn’t that just like a feminist? For 500 years, the OED has “man, male, manhood” meaning all members of the human family regardless of sex, race, or age. Now, feminists will want to delete from “woman”, “person”, “humanity,” “human,” “mankind,” and wherever “man, male, son, etc. are found. Feminists are intellectually dishonest and selfish beyond belief in their pseudo-equality pretensions, as they demand to be treated “equally as men but like a woman” at the same time…and please continue the world’s largest expensive sexist social prejudices: engagement rings, jewelry stores, and jewelry advertising (a simple law could outlaw these anti-male crimes in a minute).
    After watching the same television ad several times, I concluded that it was the most discriminatory thing I had ever seen, even worse than Donald Sterling’s disgraceful comments about Blacks. It was an ATT ad of a young saleswoman pitching four older executive women, each of whom had a comment, while a wimpy dumb executive man at the periphery and back of the group looks stupid, says nothing and then postures himself in imitation of the women’s gestures. This mockery of men is outrageous and much more elaborate than the N word or Sterling’s private mutterings. This thing is being shown many times daily for months. Worst, the message conveyed to boys is harmful and hateful. Those responsible should be expelled from all advertising forever just as Sterling was from the National Basketball Association.

    As I reflected on this ad, several points about feminism seemed evident:

    1. Feminists are frauds when they themselves use against males the very discrimination about which they complain has been used against females (The same applies to all other victimhood wackos who turn into chauvinist intolerant bullies as they ironically complain about the same thing done against them). Feminists rarely really praise and support males, especially their boys. Almost ALWAYS with boys (and almost all males), feminists will have a question (meaning he could have been better), a doubt (meaning he was likely to be wrong), an alternative (meaning he did not know the best way), or an absolute snarl (meaning he was just being wrong as all males really are all the time). Feminists do no want to listen to males. Males are always wrong. Boys are now raised psychologically castrated by feminists. This why girls have done so well in school and all else, compared to boys in some subcultures wherein the women are haremfeminists who destroy the boys by anti-male-virtue sexism and destroy the men by oversexualizing them into numbed incompetence and irrelevancy. That trend is “feminism.”
    2. Feminists destroy the family when they hit on married men. In my youth, young women respected married women by never getting involved with a married man: “He belongs to her!” was the overt rule understood by all and almost universally followed. That a man is married is no longer respected as part of the female rights of his wife. The presentation of violent or prurient females to males by the routinely sexsational press and media is basically a “sexual assault” on the males.
    3. Feminists have adopted male sexuality incompetently–as one hears young women complain of “rape” after placing themselves in flagrant copulation expected situations but then feel guilty needing, once sober, to deny consent and reject readily seen consequences not cared about when high or enjoying the excitement of a copulation expected situation. In a masturbatory culture with sexuality reduced to simple squirting and sliming any way every way, feminists cannot complain when they place themselves where and when it is expected and can easily happen.
    4. Feminists have destroyed the prime dictionary meaning of female as “designating the sex that produces ova and bears offspring” (For male, it is “designating the sex that fertilizes the ovum and begets offspring.”). Thus, the planetary and natural functioning of humans have been destroyed by feminists.
    5. Feminists openly demean and dis-empower males beginning in grade schools as the special needs of boys (because of their innate higher activity levels) are punished rather than converted into intellectual pursuits.
    6. Feminists consider “family” to be a problem rather than the natural traditional solution to incivility and lack of culture.
    7. Feminists want the natural traditional paternalism accompanying male strength and power to be replaced by passive transfer of the same paternalistic power to women who do not have to realize thankfully or even gratefully believe what they have convinced men to do. This further destroys the family as males no longer exert virtue for their family as first identified in the Moynihan Report on the Negro Family in 1965 as black males have been rendered obsolete for everything by black feminists.
    8. Feminists destroy the right to childhood by imposing adult sexuality and violence onto children so they do not learn positive life, sacrifice, virtue, love, humanity, peace, freedom and death without fear (the Catholic Mass Mantra).
    9. Feminists have increased violence against women by ignoring the most common sites of such violence: lesbian households.
    10. Feminists have become a genital cult, as party to the gay cult, which has de-natured “sex” into a selfish masturbatory culture deserving mockery, instead of love based sacredness in marriage offering unity and reproduction in concert with Nature and Nature’s God promoted by the Founders.
    11. Feminists have destroyed marriage as the psycho-social pheromone for humans ever since we escaped from biological pheromones which rule in nature for the rest of the animal kingdom confining animals to sexual activity only between opposite sexed mature members of the same species at time of likely reproduction.
    12. Feminists have become promoters of “evil is good” authority-obedience of Adolf Eichmann well proven by Stanley Milgrim. Haremfeminsts are the biggest “enablers” of sex assault by their culture of masturbation.
    13. Feminists are SELFISH SEXISTS and all the words imply.
    14. To demand EQUALITY is a trap door. Think of the woman in the elevator who struck her NFL husband in a heated argument. An “I am a man too” equal proclamation. Of course, he decks her in a quick down and out and did not wail away like he would have if she were to be treated really as a “man”. There is the other NFL guy in a bar and a pretty blond engaging in laughing then tense and hostile snarling, strikes him in the face with her closed fist–he decks her and all separate without his wailing away as if she were a man. Both gals proclaimed their womanhood after demonstrating their male-equal feminism. Both guys get penalized by the NFL who refuse to allow women to be men even when they act like men. Call it a violation of the Equal Misery Amendment as movies et al portray females as tough-as-men gals who do well fighting males–suggestible women imitate this but find the men do not crumble as on television. Then there are “fighting words” for men–perhaps women using those words should be treated equally as a man would be as a welcome to the real equality they claim to want.
    15. Feminists, by abortion’s subliminal psychological effects, reject “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Transcendentals” which means: no Judeo-Christianity = no homemakers = no childhood = no manhood = no virtue = no culture = LOSERS! = TRASH.
    16. The utopian unequal feminism of Sweden is an outrageous example of feminists getting special treatment as females so they can proclaim “equality” as the Swedish males do their universal Swed’anger–or Swedish “regretful making nice (the meaning of ‘anger in Swedish)”—-calm, benign, self-righteous, –it really comes down to “unapologetic cowardly making nice”—which the only things Swedes really do…(like not joining the Allies to shorten World War II by a year or more had they any manhood then too)–It is sort of their remaining version of Christianity. Just know that Sweden’s “feminist equality” everywhere is an oxymoron–It will be that way unless feminists are REALLY TREATED LIKE MALES every where, every time, about every thing–They will not like it.

    The outrageous ad first described above does and proves all this and it is not an isolated comment said privately like Donald Sterling’s. It is an ad run daily for months. It is hateful, discriminatory, a sexist public health hazard and against the law of equality. Feminism is really a big sexist victimism entitlement con stupefying males into deferring to women as a pretense of “equality” by becoming: a “do not assert your full male virtue and abilities in school, job hunting or anything else fool, a deadbeat unnecessary dad, an incompetent family man, a gay cult genital maniac, a drug-using uneducated unemployable parasite, and a criminal. That also was the celebrated “women’s march” all over the world in January 2017, which actually had women doing what they claimed to be protesting. Isn’t that just like a woman?

    The results are protests and riots from the Losers (nee’ Womens) March to Berkeley–ALL raging rioting protestors NEED Octavio Paz’ “San Ildefonso nocturne”:
    Good, we wanted good:
    to set the world right.
    We didn’t lack integrity:
    we lacked humility.
    What we wanted was not
    innocently wanted.
    Precepts and concepts,
    the arrogance of theologians,
    to beat with a cross,
    to institute with blood….
    Some
    became secretaries to the
    secretary
    to the General Secretary of the
    Inferno.
    Rage
    became philosophy,
    its evil has covered the
    planet.

    If you do not think this is true, check the Moynihan Report again and all that has happened to any group with feminists.

    From my pamphlet: “What the Equal Rights Amendment Means to Men” of 1974:

    Typically ignored are the following fundamental constructs of feminism:
    Barbara Balogun (in Voices From Women’s Liberation 1971): “I feel that the personal relationships of marriage must under go a revolution…the roles of male and female must be completely redefined–no, eliminated. I do not see this as possible in the present relationships of marriage…The only alternative, as I see it, is communal living…I also recognize that, conditions being what they are at the present time, most men feel so secure in their oppressive role that they will not give up their power willingly. Therefore, male-female communes will be impossible to establish. It may be that our only solution will be the dissolution of marrriage, with the foundation of all-female communes to eliminate the burdens placed on women.”

    Also in Voices From Women’s Liberation, Linda Gordon states: “Families perpetuate themselves and their bad values by educating children to see them as the only models for adult life…The nuclear family must be destroyed, and the people must find better ways of living together.”

    On the book entitled The Second Sex published in 1971, Simone de Beauvoir describes a complete lack of satisfaction in motherhood and marriage: “The tragedy of marriage is not that it fails to assure women the promised happiness…but that it mutilates her; dooms her to repetition and routine…At twenty or therabouts mistress of a home, bound permanently to a man, a child in her arms, she stands with her life virtually finished forever. Real activities, real work, are the prerogative of her man: She has mere things to occupy her which are sometimes tiring but never fully satisfying.”

    Feminism has always been “haremfeminism” and most accurately seen as the “Women’s Selfishness Movement”—and it is against Nature when compared to male/female relations for all creatures on the planet except the disordered. Finally, feminism is against Nature’s God whose Lovelution Religion gave mankind, males and females, the transcendental distinctions and nature-based relationship patterns necessary for ultimate salutary human purposes of truth, oneness, good and beauty.

    Dred Scott, Wounded Knee, Fraud Press, Children-To-Be-
    Four places in history.
    Dred Scott, Wounded Knee, Fraud Press, Children-To-Be-
    At each place someone cried.
    Dred Scott, Wounded Knee, Fraud Press, Children-To-Be-
    At each place someone died.
    Dred Scott, Wounded Knee, Fraud Press, Children-To-Be-
    For America committed suicide
    At Dred Scott, Wounded Knee, Fraud Press and Children-To-Be.

    Do not call feminists “women” or “female.” They are “haremfeminists” who should be treated equally as males in all things. “Gender” is meaningless since Oberforge v. Hodges which declared mental illnesses to be normal if part of one’s “heart of liberty.” They want equality–give it to them. No engagement rings, which are the worst sexism ever for centuries. No traditional special considerations as for real women who know and love transcendence. No door openings. No soft ball pitching. No holding back after they hit you–treat them like the “men” they want to be. Always compete and do what you would do if they were men. Otherwise, in their supreme selfishness, they will walk all over you like you are an idiot.

    • RightWriter

      Wow, Dr. Nigro — quite a tirade there! I’ve been using the Lady Macbeth analogy for ages, but I never thought of Clytemnestra! (but then, few enough people nowadays know their Shakespeare: sadly, even fewer would know Agamemnon and his queen).

      About Lady Macbeth, incidentally: are you familiar with the 1960s left-wing student-written parody, “MacBird”? There are copies around (I found one on eBay for about $2), and it’s well worth a “read” if you don’t remember it! True, the parallel IS with LBJ and HIS wife, but it’s close enough….Come to think of it, the LBJ/LadyBird = WJC/Hillary analogy is pretty close, too.

      • samnigromd

        Thank you..l missed MacBird…will try to check it out… Feel free to promulgate my stuff. I offer: THOUGHTS ON AMERICAN ANTI-VIRTUOUS-MALE-SEXISM
        Copyright c Samuel A. Nigro, MD February 2015, final 2017–retired
        Clinical Psychiatrist Case Western Reserve School of Medicine
        deplorable ad hominem pamphleteer

        FEMINISTS WANT ALL THE JOBS, ALL THE BOYS IN THE CORNER, AND ALL THE MEN IN PRISON…

        Something is wrong. American culture has been anti-virtue and anti-male for decades. It is unrecognized, universal, gross, blatantly sexist and terribly harmful to males. Basically, being very suggestible, males are being ruined by the press and media and schools. I think it is the emphasis on “equality for females”–which has turned into boys being ignored, not getting what they need, and not letting boys compete by developing and using all their abilities, which must be suppressed so the girls feel equal. The harem-feminists have sexually brainwashed men into deadbeat fathers and shamed men into being step-aside hold-the-door “unequal” stooges by being less than they can be or are, so females can be “equal.” To the contrary, “equality” means everyone can equally assert him/her-self as much as they can, and the best one “wins.” Contrived or gifted “equal outcome” is not “equality” any more than rape.

        1. Males are weak and thus raped so easily they do not even realize it or want to admit to it. Regardless, males are weak and quickly stimulated into “forced unplanned unwanted arousal”, which is “rape.” Haremfeminists are “equality men” in everything including sex, and they dress and act seductively actually raping the men. The turned-on guy follows the unspoken invitations of cleavage, jiggle, and butt eye-flutter talk, only later to be accused of sexual assault, which was actually begun by the haremfeminist who takes great anti-male pleasure by entrapping and “beating” a real man. It is just like when the “equalmale feminist” strikes a man’s face with her closed fist, but gets clobbered back (as has happened in the NFL alot) like a real man would be clobbered after he struck an NFL player, only he would get wailed on unmercifully. Picking herself up, the “equalmale female” starts the “I am a woman” routine denying, like the haremfeminist, that she started the whole mess by thinking “female equality” the whole time. Well, if women want to be equal to men, then welcome to the Equal Misery Amendment wherein you will get “equal equality”. They cannot have it both ways. If they rape or hit the guys, they will get it back in return. When wanting to be male, they cannot pull the old pre-haremfeminism unequal “poor little old me I’m a woman” routine when she finds her “equalmaleness” is unequal. All should be fully treated like the “male” they claimed to be, and that may not be pleasant.
        2. Ads degrade men. AT&T and Time-Warner had and have ads where women and minority men look and sound good, while the white male is a wimp and stupidly unable to talk sense (None but a white male would have ever been demeaned in that way). That ad company should be shut down or be fined like the NBA did to its racist owner. What do young kids think when they see such crap? Progressive had such an ad and Mercury Insurance degraded white males too. The idiot in any ad is always a white male.
        3. Men still give expensive engagement rings–an outrageous anti-male inequality never addressed by feminists, who want “to be men” but not treated as “men treat men.” For males, “forget” about treating women as females–they want to be “equal” as men, then treat them that way.
        4. In most settings (whether work, home, public, government), females can act as aggressive males but males cannot. Professing “equality”, females proceed; and males are told to step aside and not exert their own nature, because females are doing it for them. Then there is the feminist who acts the man–drinks, swears, asserts, projects self, insults, and then strikes out when he tells her off. So he strikes back as if she was the man she wanted to be–and suddenly she is a poor woman again being struck by a man. What frauds feminists are. You cannot treat them “like a man” even when they say they are and carry on like one. She wants to punch you out; tries to do so; and then cries “I am a woman” when you treat her like the so-called “man” she tried to be.
        5. “Patriarchy” has been defamed and destroyed to the detriment of male development. Indeed, where there are no patriarchs, there are no feminists.
        6. “Virtue” (vir = man) has become anathema because of anti-religious prejudice. Also, “man” has become selfishly forbidden as the generic term for “bipedal human creature of any age, sex or nature” which means that “man”, properly used, is “any creature with human DNA.” “Man” actually is the abbreviated “mankind” or “humanity.” The suppression of “man” is psychologically damaging to developing males by depriving them of the freedom and expectations for manly virtue identity and self-worth manhood as part of the human species, which includes the power to speak freely and act equally about what is un-virtuous.
        7. Childhood for males is destroyed by intrusion of adult sexuality with resulting distraction from needed pre-adult learning and development. Boys are easily seduced (“raped”) into prurience of any kind, routinely intensely offered day in and day out by the press & media. Normal “infatuation” or “puppy love” incidents easily become pathologically exaggerated into non-male gender identification or obsessional dysmorphic male disorders. Press and media self-inflating sensationalism is responsible.
        8. The abandonment of natural law and planetary aspects of human sexuality, by abortion and by contraception, has created a masturbatory entropic culture destroying family life as males are prohibited relevance and deprived of self-fulfillment and success as natural males being head of the family.
        9. Government bureaucrats have replaced men as providers for home, women and children–and jobs are sent overseas which might enable men to reassume a provider role. For the home and elsewhere, males have been rendered obsolete. Even in the military and draft, now women are part and, I remind: EQUALITY DEMANDS THERE CAN BE NO RULE, GUIDELINE, DIRECTIVE, ORDER, OR MANEUVER REQUIRING MALES TO DO MORE THAN FEMALES…unless the male is awarded more in proportion to the difference performed–equal pay for equal work–and more for more–PERIOD. No where will male maximum ability be discriminated against more than in the military and likely in the police and fire-fighting professions, unless they get paid with equal equality as the norm.
        10. Childhood for males is destroyed by an over-stimulating violent culture with resulting loss of self-reflective self-control consistent with prosocial and personal development. By violence, males are deprived of reflective empathic problem-solving learning experiences accurately characterized as “virtue.” Press and media self-inflating sensationalism is responsible for the destruction of childhood.
        11. Female hormones in birth control medications and diet contribute to the male predominance of attention deficit disorder, autism, atypical development, learning disabilities, anxiety-rage-mood disorders, and gender confusion. Female hormones are against males in nature.
        12. Homes, schools and organizations attend more and more to addressing learning and personal/personhood development for girls while boys are deprived and disregarded, more and more, as disciplinary problems. The “content of male character” is emptied. Press and media self-inflating suppression of male virtue is partially responsible.
        13. The absence of and the inappropriate demeaning of fathers and other men as “oppressors” removes virtuous men as models for development, and conditions men to move to a non-virtuous mode. Sex-wise too: Husbands used to be respected as “belonging to his wife” and not to be “hit on” by other women–which is total disrespect for “the wife,” is anti-virtue and destroys the family–Haremfeminism at its self-proclaimed “best.” Actually, haremfeminism destroys males’ commitment to his wife (or any woman, for that matter) rendering her “unnecessary” so he fades out of family oneness; and even the wife no longer “needs” him as she too joins the feminist harem (A case can be made that this is the basis for the demise of the family–the meaninglessness of marriage vows because of haremfeminism).
        14. Males are rendered unequal and inferior when females compete with males as if females are males but , at the same time, females egregiously demand special considerations as females, while male innate potentials are suppressed. Perhaps the worst is the “equality” of females to “party” like males; then unwittingly stimulate the males (“raping” them?); then protest, as “rape,” the consequences of mutual loss of virtue.
        15. Males’ innate higher energy seeks “escape” from any culture degrading and abusing them. Young desperate deprived males readily find marihuana, alcohol, and street drugs as “escape” paralyzing them into lesser educated and lesser job qualified conditions in which their “escape” methods result in anti-social and criminal survival. Childhood and education must offer equal development of maximum beneficial outcome.
        16. Being a “productive and working” (essential to “virtuous”) male has been de-emphasized into drug linked prurient violent paralysis, with press and media self-inflating sensationalism responsible. Work force data:
        All males not in work force (wf)–13% in 1948; 30 % in 2013.
        Age 25-54 (working age) males not in wf–3% in 1951; 4% in 1970; 12% in 2013.
        Age 25-54 (working age but not in wf) males refusing to work–54 % in 1994;
        73 % in 2006; 64 % in 2013.
        < 25 year old males not in wf–24% in 1976; 22 % in 1978; 43 % in 2013.
        All females not in wf–67 % in 1948; 40 % in 2008; 43 % in 2013.
        17. Financial investments in private prisons and prison support industries by judges and any others in the legal system are enhanced by over-criminalization of males. The lack of genuine "rehabilitation" is just more profit for those investing in the prison system.
        Males incarcerated in 1945–250,000; in 2015–over 2.5 million.
        This overcriminalization is an absolute proof of an anti-male culture.
        18. According to the Supreme Court, all laws must make all EQUAL and must be GENDERLESS. "Gender" has been destroyed by the gay cult because "sex" is no longer "reproductive" as it is in nature. "Gender" is now one's preferred way of masturbating–a Great Britain survey of older students offered 25 different "genders" to choose for oneself. Gender is meaningless. No one person of any gender can be required to do more than any one of any other gender–even in the military…and if you do more, then you get paid more. And the first gender equalizing law must be the prohibition of engagement rings or their equalization. Genderless standards must now be the common good. Equal equality means gender consideration is prohibited.

        CLOSURE:
        The press and media in particular have failed the Founders' mandate and expectations that the First Amendment would maintain virtuous men (male and female) to sustain our democracy. It is time other actions are taken to create virtuous males as well as females. "Freedom" has become "Anything goes, just call it 'art'" and "Do not tell me I am wrong"–paradigms resulting in existence without virtue–Press and media self-inflating sensationalism is responsible and is the undoing of the Founders because "deviant pseudo-freedom" has replaced responsible virtue. THE PRESS & MEDIA CELEBRATE VIOLENCE–and many are vulnerable and suggestible to imitate what they see, especially if deprived of real childhood and of traditional virtuous fathers. Thus, the "self-evident truths" no longer exist if un-virtuous or anti-transcendental. Unless there is a minimum of "virtue" (dare I say "Christian Virtue") in a system, overt or sub rosa, the people are no good to the degree that even laws will not sustain the so-called "culture," because virtuous men are essential for truth, oneness, good and beauty. Society must condition males to be virtuous. Anti-virtuous-male-sexism must stop. Special pleading sexism must stop. Actually, equal opportunity for content of character should rule.

        REFERENCES: I just finished Who Killed the American Family by Phyllis Schlafly…WND Press, Washington, D.C. 2014. It is an outstanding review and totally supported by my preceding comments above. She confirms my ideas also. I also recommend Domestic Tranquility: A Brief Against Feminism by F. Carolyn Graglia…I have a full review available written in 2007. My review in 2012 of The Victim's Revolution: The Rise of Identity Studies and the Closing of the Liberal Mind by Bruce Bawer is also helpful in understanding all the prejudices against men. My reviews of It Takes A Village by Hillary Clinton and It's Perfectly Normal by Robie H. Harris complete the destruction of virtuous men. For these reviews, email be at [email protected].

  • Chuck

    Hil-liar-y, you were not elected because you are a nasty liar and crook! Thank GOD the people could see through you!

    • Gary Smith

      AMEN

  • richard black

    #me too…HILLARIOUS??????

  • dank440

    All the rhetoric in the world will not cover the dishonesty and hatred the clintons have! They want to give away Americans money, but they have made millions off the trusting (and maybe naive) American public. Many may have short term memory on Hillarys screw ups to include Libya as you should NEVER have been sec of state! Only as a pay off from your rival obooma, another snake.

  • Monticello Shuttles

    In politics has there ever been a more self-centered narcissist!? Seriously, will my Grand Children have to read in history books her whining and excuses about losing an election that was 100% her own fault and no one else’s!

    • RightWriter

      I don’t know how old your grandkids are, but chances are by the time they’re reading “history books” that cover 2016 there will be newer books that barely mention Hillary — they’ll have moved on to someone else. But you’re right: her loss was 100% her own fault (and if she DID run again, it’d only be REPEATED, in spades).
      Even history book publishers are getting tired of her repeated rant. She lost because nobody liked her, except her own cadre of devoted feminazis — and there just weren’t ENOUGH of THEM.

      • Monticello Shuttles

        Say thanks for the reply. I truly liked it. Off topic but on the subject of books, I just read that the city of Duluth MN. just pulled “To Kill A Mockingbird” and “Huckleberry Finn” from library shelves and their schools. So there ya go! 🙂 Political Correctness at it’s finest!

  • Larry5469

    Liar, liar, pants on fire… oh yeah, you losing was simply due to you being a born loser.. being female had NOTHING to do with it.. your arrogance had plenty to do with it. You thought you had stolen the election but we saw through it. You knocked Bernie out of the race by using your crooked contacts and falsehoods repeated over and over… sort of like you are trying to get away with on Trump.

    • Dan Menard

      Larry; Your reply was a bit on the harsh side…TRUE, but a bit harsh!

      • Larry Hall

        Dan, it is 100% deserved. Clintons earned that crooked reputation starting in Arkansas with the White Water scandal & it’s been scandal after crooked scandal since then. Why would anyone want that kind of record to be their president? As in their case, the past repeats itself…as long as they get away with it. They are NOT above the law!

        • Ron C

          Well…unless we can clean up this third world cop shop…I’m afraid she is above the law, and with the blessings of the corrupted courts…just saying?

        • Gary Smith

          They think they are

    • Dan Menard

      Larry, Please remember that I did agree with you in my comment that “it was True!”
      They should and hopefully will be doing big time in the BIG HOUSE for their misdeeds!

  • clem

    That coughing (unt ain’t no woman. Hell, slick Willy won’t even touch that old snake.

    • Gary Smith

      Ha Ha

  • baitmando

    What a tired old hag.

    • Gary Smith

      Yes!

  • spudmans1

    The word Sex and Hillary should not be used in the same sentence as it is an oxymoron!

    • Gary Smith

      LOL

    • E Scott Hollingsworth

      Shittlery is just a moron. Nothing oxy to do with it.

  • fbair1

    Uh, youre corrupt to the core hillary maybe that had something to do with it, you reckon?

  • Greg Zonker

    I have absolutely NO problem with a women being President. My problem was with Hillery being that women. She is dishonest and will do and say anything. Given the right woman, i would vote for her and race will have nothing to do with it.

  • Tired…

    Talk about out of touch! I didn’t vote for her because she is a dishonest, self-centered individual with poor decision making skills who places her political interests above all else, including the lives of others.

    • Gary Smith

      Me too

    • RightWriter

      Very well said!

  • Dasgeiss

    Wow, Hillary really is out of reality! She belongs in a nut house. Her delusions are way out there! After Benghazi I wouldn’t have voted even for Trump even if it was him and not her in that underhanded debacle. She apparently thinks nothing of corruption; it is totally all right with her. Put your money where your mouth is, Hillary. Give all the money back you took from foreign countries…that would be a start. Course that will never happen; you earned it the corrupt way!

    • Ron C

      All socialist’s are third world corrupt…period! And yet the useful idiots & indoctrinated keep voting for the third world socialist democrap’s!

    • Gary Smith

      She belongs in Gitmo with Obama

      • DaveyJ

        Their collective crimes have set the USA up for a very rough ride! Keep playing the Hillary wants to be Queen stuff, see just where that gets us! The Media hovers on her hatred like it was a wonder drug when it is POISON!

  • MyRoseHasTHORNS

    No one sees you as a woman or protector of women! I see you as a shriveled up old C–T who is mostly Lesbian but will allow for pr*cks if they help empower her. I see you as a lying, manipulative, sleezy, thieving POS! Wish you’d shut up and go the Hell AWAY, take your Rules for Radicals with you. The sleeping giant does not want you!

  • Catherine Pietsch

    Hillary is a rapist enabler and calls her husband’s victims “bimbos”. She cares nothing about the huMAN race, other than the power it can bring to HER. Hillary–even the mental process of calling Bill her “husband” is causing me to get a headache. Husband? Partner in crime is more correct. Power mongering association instead of a real marriage. “Wife of…” She has no concept of what a wife is.

    I am a woman. She is not. She does not represent me, and never will.
    Watch out USA and the world, the leftist media is grooming Bill and Hillary’s “all eggs in one basket” offspring to run for office. I have read analysts of Chelsea Clinton Mezvinsky has ‘never had an original thought’ and is a perfect puppet for her parents agenda.

    Marc Mezvinsky is a former investment banker and the co-founder of the hedge fund Eaglevale Partners, which recently closed its business in Greece. Perhaps they figured the Clinton Foundation was going to be more than enough to continue their wealth?

    Chelsea’s husband is the son of Edward Mezvinsky, who served five years in prison after being convicted on a count 31 charges of felony fraud in 2001. Then President Bill Clinton had the opportunity to pardon Edward Mezvinsky, but there was no pardon as it was seen to be detrimental to the Clintons to do so. Wife Marjorie Mezvinsky is reported to have pleaded for her husband to be saved from prison. Both of Chelsea’s in-laws were members of Congress.

    Groomed very well.—-Politics. Dirty money. Fraud….

  • jim jones

    That slimy bitch would blame Jesus ; if she thought someone would pay a fee to hear it!

    • Gary Smith

      Yes she would

  • Deplorable Irredeemable Susan

    We don’t mind electing a woman for president, just not YOU, Hildabeast!
    Hillary, what about all the women you threatened, debased, and discredited, when Billy boy
    raped or molested them? You were the main misogynist at that time, eh? How is your
    relationship with Huma these days? Speaking of gay rights! How is that globalization of
    the economy going these days? Any downturn in that Clintoon Fundation? Yes, Hilly, “What
    Happened”is people woke up to the fact that you truly are “Crooked Hillary”, to the max!

  • Ron C

    Ahh heck…Hillary is just lashing out because not everyone bought into her being a “Goddess from on high” BS that she was trying to sell…Hillary you are a disgusting old criminal that has gotten away with murder…
    Just count your luck stars that you were able to get the so called third world authorities to buy your crap!

  • midogman

    she is so delusional.

  • randolph.poole

    What a vile, disgusting POS this woman is!

  • Steven Earle

    Blame it on the moon, blame it on high tides, global warming but never accept that people don’t like Hillary, don’t trust Hillary, believe Hillary broke the law, covered up her server crimes and is a phony and a liar.

  • Junior Sampals

    Hillary, it didn’t help your chances when you told American voters that they were “REPREHENSIBLE”
    Then Hillary, instead of kissing babies, you only want to kill them.

  • George Spatz

    LMAOROFL

  • Reed10

    The liberal society Hillary and her cult following want would be inclusive and tolerant to non-conservatives only and include just liberals.

  • parthenon1

    PLEASE GOODBYE HILLARY !

  • TheEngineer73

    No! You are wrong to think that. The American people didn’t want a crook in the white house any longer. They actually wanted to “Make America Great Again”.

  • DaveyJ

    Maybe people should be informed of how very twisted her own sexual outlook is….
    Not pretty, and don’t and don’t think all the blame lies with Bill Clinton. This is one self centered BITCH!

  • peter Pirzadeh

    Boy, is she good at rationalizing her miserable defeat. Somebody should tell her point blank brow up, act like a “real” woman you purport to admire, accept defeat, stop pouting and complain how others made you fail and stop using misogyny and sexism to try to fool the vulnerable and gullible American a few of whom still exist. The majority though are all too aware of your criminality, the lies, the bleach bits, the email deletions, the Benghazi debacle, the foundation conduit to funnel funds and aaaaaal the rest. Admitting any of those will give you a fighting chance with a few Americans you’re trying so hard to still fool.

  • Arnold Young

    Billary has a SEX??? I never knew that!

  • Suzu M

    It is true that I myself do not wish for a female president (yes, I’m female), but that is NOT the reason I did not vote for Hillary (and if no good man is available I would vote for a good woman.)The reasons are probably too many to list, but to quickly sum up: I don’t trust her. I don’t like her attitude towards those who disagree with her. And I most certainly don’t like her stance on abortion.
    Just because you can dress someone up in a dress, doesn’t make her a lady worth voting for. Just because she can get sassy, doesn’t make her strong leadership material. And her ‘gift’ for smoothing over lies is pretty frightening.

    You know, people try to pin Trump down with all kinds of mental health issues, but Hillary seems to have some of her own. One one hand she acts like she thinks she can rule the world and on the other ten hands she lists all the reasons she’s a victim of losing our vote. There’s a diagnosis for that, isn’t there?

    • RightWriter

      I’m female, too, and I’d LOVE to see a woman in the White House — IF SHE WAS A WORTHY OCCUPANT OF THE OVAL OFFICE (which means, among other attributes, a conservative). Carly Fiorina wasn’t my first choice in 2016, but I’d have voted for her if she’d won the nomination. (Hell, I’m old enough that I’d have voted for CLARE BOOTHE LUCE if we’d been able to talk her into it in 1964! In fact, I’d have been THRILLED to cast THAT vote!)

      But I don’t want ANYONE in the White House, female or male, who lies her (or his) way to get there, or buys and sells influence to UNfriendly foreign powers, or calls women who don’t share her radical politics “deplorables.”
      I don’t want ANY woman who doesn’t understand that abortion has NOTHING to do with “letting a woman control HER OWN body,” but allows women to TAKE THE LIFE OF ANOTHER HUMAN BEING (her baby).
      I don’t want ANY woman who will LIE to cover up her husband’s philandering — and then BLAME THE WOMEN he bedded.
      I don’t want ANY woman who will trade AMERICAN interests for those of ANY other country, friendly or not.
      And I don’t want ANY woman who blames AMERICAN WOMEN for her failures in politics. In other words, I DON’T WANT HILLARY CLINTON. So, if I have to go on voting for the best of the MEN, so be it.

      • Suzu M

        lol, Be my friend. chuckle. I like the way you think. Though I must be a bit younger- I’ve never even HEARD of Clare.
        Nikki Haley seems to have it together…

  • Steve

    Maybe you are just a crummy candidate and a despicable person? And maybe the voters are smart enough to see through the façade and realize this? I think this is “What Happened”, and could have been written in these two lines, saving people a ton of money.

  • Spunky

    So she is still telling lies

  • don from georgia

    is there anyway clinton lost because she was a shit candicate and thief and crooked lying bit h

  • RightWriter

    Or maybe Hillary lost because even people who share her feminism don’t LIKE or TRUST her. I’m NOT a feminist, and I have NEVER been able to STAND her, but I have a friend who pretty much shares her political views — but wouldn’t vote for her on a bet (quote) “because, well, she’s a bitch. She’d betray her husband, her daughter, her mother, her best friend if it would gain her ONE POINT in the opinion polls. ”
    Fact is, Hillary gives almost everybody heartburn — even her political allies can’t STAND her.

  • DonRS

    52 weeks in a year, 52 cards in the deck. Hillary runs from pillar to post to explain how it is possible that she LOST! BOO HOO! Can you imagine, with the ROTTEN, CORRUPT FBI, DOJ, Federal Judiciary and “Intelligence Community, just how bad it would be, today, after another year of their blessed illegal, unethical, unconstitutional actions. They already make the Gestapo look like amateurs!

  • Albedamned!

    She could easily be replaced by artificial intelligence!

Fromtheright.com - 2015 | Privacy Policy