Graham Speaks On FBI Investigation

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is certain that the extended FBI background check of Supreme Court associate justice nominee Brett Kavanaugh was done correctly without any interference.

Graham stated, “It’s a complete report. It’s a background check. I’m confident the FBI did a good job. They were not hindered in any way. The focus was allegations before the committee. I was looking for certain things to be answered by witnesses. I’m more confident than ever that what the committee found has held up and then some. The main thing for me is that you need to go to the and need to ask them did they feel like they were able to do their job without interference, and I think the answer is yes. Over 150 people have been interviewed throughout the course of Brett Kavanaugh’s life. To those who suggest he had a problem like this from prior interviews, no evidence of that. That’s all manufactured. The senators who requested the supplemental FBI background check got what they requested, and I am ready to vote.”

  • The_Frog_Prince
  • Jorg37

    That FBI “report” will soon be exposed as a scandal!

    • cardmaster1

      The only “scandal” here is the despicable and Unethical manner in which the Lunatic DemocRAT “leaders” conducted themselves! It was nothing but an orchestrated riot by Mob Rule!! DemocRATS are so out of control and unhinged that they really should be declared a Menace to society! Even members of their own party are lamenting the total absence of reason and sense of fair play and are Leaving the party. Mom’s with sons are moving over to the Red side because they can see the Terrible precedent it would set to Automatically Believe any, and every, female that made Unsubstantiated and decades old accusations with Zero proof! How those women that Automatically believed Ford, in the face of NO witnesses in her favor, no memory of When, Where, or How and him with Three witnesses that Vehemently denied it happened, her testimony that changed and was full of holes can Ignore ALL of that and Still cry foul is beyond imagination. Republicans bent over backwards to accommodate her. The only problem is that they did not Automatically believe her in the face of all the Holes and Contradictions in her story. The saddest part of it?? They STILL cannot accept that it was a Hatchet job and that their “leaders” we’re determined to object to ANYONE Trump named. Childish at best, Despicable at worst. Personally, I hope the Dems Pay Dearly for their Atrocious deeds.

    • Richard Carlsen

      JONG…..YOU RAPED ME…DON’T REMEMBER WHEN, WHERE,HOW I GOT THERE BUT “I AM 100% SURE THAT YOU. JONG, RAPED ME!!!!” QUICK, QUICK, SOMEBODY CALL THE POLICE, ARREST YOU, JONG, AND CONVICT YOU W/O PROOF OR WITNESSES KANGAROO COURT-STYLE AND CONVICT ON WORDS ALONE. YOU ARE NOW BRETT KAVANAUGH!!. I HAVE BEEN RAPED, AND THREATENED WITH BEING ACCUSED OF RAPE BY ASSORTED WOMEN IF I DIDN’T BLINDLY COMPLY WITH THEIR REQUESTS, WHICH BY THE WAY WERE ALL SEXUAL. SO WHICH COUNTRY….SOVIET UNION, CHINA, IRAN, VENEZUELA, ETC….DO YOU MR ‘S…T’ FOR ‘BRAINS JONG SHALL I BUY YOUR ONE-WAY, AND ONLY ONE-WAY TICKET. BY THE WAY, THE DEMOCRAT DISORDER OF “COTB/DOTM”, or ‘CONSTIPATION OF THE BRAIN WITH DIARRHEA OF THE MOUTH” HAS NOT ONLY BECOME PANDEMIC WITH MANY DEMOCRATS, ITS BECOMING CHRONIC AND TERMINAL.

      • Jorg37

        Let me make a bold assumption: you are a Trump supporter! Right?

  • flashy0ne

    This whole thing has been a FARCE from beginning to end!! The democrats had NO INTENTION to vote for confirmation — NO MATTER WHAT. This Senate vote could have been taken BEFORE the ‘committee’ hearing and it would have been the same. The ONLY intent of the democrats was “maybe we can get ONE of them to defect BECAUSE it CERTAINLY won’t be one of us. Of what use is a “hearing” if minds are ALREADY MADE UP????? This whole thing has been a DISGRACE.

    • apzzyk

      That is probably true because the most likely reason why the 60 vote was required to confrim all nominees regardless of the party of the Presient was to try to get someone more moderate on to the bench so that there would at least be a little suspense on the final decision. That worked for Roberts who went against expectations when he swang to being the deciding vote in the individual mandate case on the ACA. By going to the nuclear opetion with Gorsuch, there was no holding Trump back on appointing the most extreme one that was on his list to the bench. This means that there is no suspense left, so why would anyone take their case to the court rather than just taking individual revenge? I have been following the lower courts on criminal matters for quite few years, and have noticed something that I see as being very wrong. Everyone should know that the Constitution gives all the right to an open trial with a jury of your peers, and from the cop shows, an attorney appointed if the person cannot afford one. Thar sounds very nice, but when you look behind that, the sound does not really conceal the smell of a totally stacked deck in favor of the prosecution at the federal level and probably in most states. To see the top part of this cap over a pile of crap all that you have to do, is look at how much court attorneys are routinely paid and compare that with the going price for almost any attorney in your area. The Act which provides for this pay, is 18 USC 3006A which provides for payment of appointed attorneys at the rate of $60 an hour for preparation and $75 an hour for court time up to a maximum of $7,000 for the whole defense. By comparison, my plumber and electrician charge over $125 for their time an hour, plus parts and supplies, and my private attorney who only does wills and trusts charges $250 an hour, with no cap on the charges for defending your will in courts if that becomes necessary. Ever heard about getting what you pay for?
      In 2015 there were 50,000 sent to Federal prisons in the US and fewer than 2,000 criminal trials, which means that 96% did not exercise their right to a trial at all, but took a guilty plea. When I was doing my research several years ago, I found one inmate whose parents has paid an attorney to plead him guilty in exchange for letting him do his 5 years for bank robbery – he had been caught in the act, so all that he got was his place of confinement and had he used the court appointed one might have gotten sent to a place as far away as possible. Just this would seem to show something like a 96% conviction rate, which looks good. In James Mitchner’s novel POLAND he describes a trial by a NAZI trigunal during WWII, where those to be exccuted immediately were sent out one door and those found guilty out another one, where the defendant had to represent himself, and it only had a conviction rate of 95% – worse than our DOJ. The so-called witch hunt, with the guilty pleas of Manafort with no gurarantee of geting credit for copperation, and Cohen doing the same is doing better than expected and so far all of the defendants have had private counsel, and have even, without indictments gotten Trump s CFO of 40 years and the publisher of the Enquirer to volunteer to tell more.
      We are now in the lull before the election that is SOP – which Comey violated to Trump’s benefit by brining up the emails found on Hillaries aide’s laptop, all of which were shown to be duplicates, just 3 days before the election. Now we still hear that the ones who benefited from the Comey action and the following the rules action of the Obama DOJ in not revealing the on going before the election into possible Russian influence as being bad for the one who profited from both as being bad for him.
      What we are seeing is the development of hubris or a false sense of being secure in power that, according to Charles Colson, one of Nixon’s men who went to prison in Watergate, said had happened in the White House when it thought that it was getting all of cards in the game then and was consolodating power. Trump is only holding on to Sessions until after the election and probably does not realize that Mueller is following the rules that Comey did not, so it will be a contest on the day after the election on timing – whether the new indictments are filed before or after Sessions is fired. Once they are filed, all is out of Trumps control because the career employees will do the actual prosecution, as they did with Manafort. Jr., Son in law, or both?

    • captainmorse

      Flashyone I agree with you…but we need to take it a step further…Being that Elections are around the corner the Democrats by throwing all this hoopla and crap at destroying Kavanaugh, they hoped to at least Stall his confirmation. They feel strongly that a “Blue Wave” vote, will renew their power in the house, and that they would then be able to drop Kavanaugh completely. To their
      foolish chagrin, they miserably failed and in that failure they are now as usual, they are pointing out the “Blame Fingers” at every one else [including the Porn Star Attorney]….everyone except themselves. Democrats and the Liberal Left have been since Trump too office, continually showing their true colors over and over again. Many that were even once staunch Democrats have and/or are defecting from that side and gravitating to the Right side. The Dems/Liberal Left are on a downhill slide and they know it. It will be interesting to so just what kind of corrupt games of Cheating they will play in the coming elections.

    • william bailey

      I totally agree , it should of been a TV movie of the week !

  • Dodie1990

    Thank You Sen. Graham for standing up and defending Judge Kavanaugh. It surely helped. Now if we could only get Jeff Sessions to stand up and clean up the corruption atr Justice. and the FBI

  • Deplorable Irredeemable Susan

    What did the Dims expect from the FBI investigation?
    What forensic evidence would exist after 36 years?
    Who would corroborate fake stories cooked up by Ford,
    Swetnick or Ramirez? They were are telling lies, which
    nobody would agree to confirm. I guess maybe the FBI is
    under enough suspicion for them to lie for the Dims on this.

  • ADBDAB

    Democrats – for heaven sakes – you held the letter from Ford from the Judicial Committee; you named every type of crime that you are involved in – sexual misconduct, lying, making up your own facts and even had a PORNO LAWYER trying destroy a family, SO I SUGGEST AS ONE OF YOUR MEMBERS SAID — SHUT-UP.

  • Dickens10

    I wish they would do a full investigation into the three women who brought the charges. Maybe some rich (hint hint) Republican can hire a PI to check them out. I suspect all three are lying and working either to advance themselves or the DNC. Either way, what they did is illegal.

  • Finally! And, thanks to Flake and Collins for seeing the truth! So, now the Democrats had better leave this alone, and that means you Nancy Pelosi, STFU! By the way Nancy, you do know that Trump is the President, and NOT Bush, right?

  • LeRoy H Beltz

    the democrats should pay the bill for the delay instead of screwing the tax payers again .Everyone knows this was a set up by Feinstein Durbin Schumer another dirty way of destroying a perfectly good family man ,thats because they haven’t any morals . Now the tax payers need the list of senators, that this country spent 17000,000 .00 dollars on for cover ups. Tom Fitton needs foya the records . We the tax payers need to know this and have every right to .We know Dick Durbin beat his wife ,we know Chuck Schumer got his baby sitter pregnant ,we know Blumenthal is a liar that never served in Vietnam WE know that Booker grope a lady ,we know that Ellision hit his girl friend .We know that Bill Clinton. WE all know that the democrats are Dirty, not quit all but the majority are swamp dwellers ,and especially the whole prior administration .All they want is control of the world and the money.The Republicans need to set new records voting in November and in 2020 ,lets keep America Free

Fromtheright.com - 2015 | Privacy Policy